1. Buying first, asking questions later
Although there are a number of robust detection and prevention technologies on the market, even the best device or solution is only as good as the workflow that supports it. Consider an organization that has purchased thermal cameras to screen employees’ temperatures. The first high-temperature alert is not the time to be asking key questions like: Which personnel should respond? What do we do with the potential at-risk employee? How do we handle other employees who feel threatened by the alert?
The device decision example highlights, perhaps, the most important aspect of returning to the workplace: developing a detailed strategy and supporting workflows to ensure the return can be implemented and managed effectively, without comprising the effectiveness of the technologies and, above all, people’s health.
2. Applying a one-size-fits-all approach
A return to the workplace strategy that works for one business location (e.g., a warehouse) might not be appropriate for another (e.g., a field office). Each type of location will likely pose different challenges, such as disparities in the number of employees required to work on-site and the availability of support staff to manage detection and prevention technologies. Similarly, companies that do not consult with a range of leaders and managers across the organization to develop their return-to-the-workplace strategy risk overlooking certain departmental or employee needs — and falling prey to blind spots.
3. Piecemealing solutions
Purchasing detection and prevention technologies without a comprehensive strategy to guide decisions can also lead organizations to acquire individual point solutions from a wide range of vendors. Organizations that follow this approach may be challenged to operationalize their individual technologies effectively or in coordination with one another. The absence of a centralized, connected ecosystem also makes it more difficult to aggregate data in real time, hampering the organization’s ability to make informed, in-the-moment decisions about how to respond to alerts or adjust solutions.
Likewise, working with a wide range of vendors can be more time-consuming to oversee and manage and, potentially, more expensive than buying solutions in higher volume from fewer vendors. Using multiple vendors may also make it harder to find the best solutions for the business’s unique needs as well as additional support for managing the solutions and evolving them for future use cases.